Concept of Development in Situational Leadership

The Situational Leadership Concept

Concept of development in situational leadership. According to the situational theory of leadership, there is no one-size-fits-all leadership style. Instead, it is determined by the leadership style and techniques that are most appropriate for the situation. According to this idea, the most effective leaders can adjust their leadership style to the problem and consider cues such as the work at hand, the character of the group, and other elements that may help them complete the task.

After its creators, Dr. Paul Hersey, author of "The Situational Leader," and Kenneth Blanchard, author of "One-Minute Manager," situational leadership theory is often referred to as the Hersey-Blanchard Situational Leadership Theory.

Styles of Leadership

According to Hersey and Blanchard, there are four primary leadership styles:

• Telling (S1): In this leadership style, the leader informs people what to do and how to do it.
• Selling (S2) is a more back-and-forth style between leaders and followers. To encourage group members to buy into the process, leaders must "sell" their ideas and message.
• Participating (S3): In this technique, the leader gives less direction and encourages group members to contribute more ideas and make decisions.
• Delegating (S4): This leadership style is defined by a less dynamic, hands-off approach. Group members make most decisions, and they bear the majority of the blame for what occurs.

Levels of Maturity

The person or group's maturity level (i.e., the level of knowledge and skill) determines the appropriate leadership style.

According to Hersey and Blanchard's hypothesis, there are four levels of maturity:

• M1: The group members lack the necessary knowledge, abilities, and motivation to execute the assignment.
• M2: Members of the group are eager and energetic, but they lack the necessary skills.
• M3: Group members possess the necessary skills and abilities to execute the work, but they refuse to accept responsibility.
• M4: The group members are highly skilled and eager to achieve the mission.

Matching Levels and Styles

Maturity levels and leadership styles can be matched. According to the Hersey-Blanchard model, the following leadership styles are best for different maturity levels:

• Maturity Level 1 (M1)—Telling (S1)
• Selling Medium Maturity (M2) (S2)
• Maturity Level 3 (M3)—Participating (S3)
• Maturity 4 (M4)—Delegation (S4)

How Does It Work?

When followers lack the responsibility or knowledge to work independently, a more "telling" style may be required at the start of a project. However, when subordinates gain experience and understanding, the leader may wish to take a more delegating approach.

This situational leadership paradigm emphasizes flexibility, allowing leaders to adjust to the requirements of their followers and the demands of the situation.

The situational approach to leadership also avoids the pitfalls of the single-style process by recognizing that there are many different ways to approach a problem and that leaders must be able to assess a situation as well as the maturity levels of subordinates to determine which approach will be the most effective at any given time.

As a result, situational theories pay more attention to the complexities of dynamic social circumstances and the many individuals operating in many roles who ultimately influence the outcome.

Situational Leadership II

Kenneth Blanchard created the Situational Leadership II (or SLII) model, improving Blanchard and Hersey's initial theory. According to the revised version of the theory, effective leaders must base their conduct on the developmental level of group members for specific tasks.

Competence and Dedication

The level of competence and commitment of each individual determines their developmental level. These levels are as follows:

• Beginner with zeal (D1): high devotion, low ability.
• Disillusioned Learner (D2): Some competency but a lack of commitment due to setbacks.
• Capable but cautious performer (D3): Competence increases, but commitment levels vary.
• Self-sufficient achiever (D4): High levels of competence and dedication.

Leadership Styles in SLII

According to SLII, successful leadership requires two key behaviors: supporting and directing. Giving precise directions and instructions and seeking to influence the conduct of group members are examples of directing behaviors. Actions such as encouraging subordinates, listening, and providing appreciation and feedback are supportive behaviors.

According to the theory, there are four primary leadership styles:

• Directing (S1): A high percentage of running activities and a low percentage of supporting behaviors.
• Coaching (S2): Exhibits a high level of guiding and supporting behaviors.
• Supporting (S3): This type of behavior has a low level of directing behavior and a high level of supporting activity.
• Low on both directing and supporting behaviors while delegating (S4).

The essential premise of the SLII hypothesis is that none of these four leadership styles is superior to the others. Instead, an excellent leader will tailor their actions to each subordinate's developmental skill for the work at hand.

Factors to Consider

According to experts, leaders must consider four crucial contextual aspects while assessing the issue.

Take into account the relationship.

The leaders must consider the relationship between the leaders and the group members. Social and interpersonal aspects can influence which strategy is most effective.

A group lacking in efficiency and productivity, for example, can benefit from a leadership style that emphasizes order, regulations, and clearly defined positions. A productive group of highly trained workers, on the other hand, might benefit from a more democratic approach that permits members to work freely while yet having a say in organizational choices.

Think about the job.

The leader must consider the task itself. Jobs might be complex or straightforward, but the leader must have a clear understanding of what the assignment includes to judge whether it was completed properly and competently.

Consider the Authority Level

The leader's level of influence over the members of the group should also be examined. Some leaders have the authority to fire, employ, reward, or chastise subordinates simply because of their position. Other leaders develop influence through cultivating connections with employees, frequently by earning their respect, providing assistance, and assisting them in feeling included in decision-making.

Take into account your maturity level.

Leaders must assess the maturity level of each group member, as suggested by the Hersey-Blanchard model. The maturity level is a measurement of a person's capacity to finish a task and their willingness to do so. It's a recipe for disaster to assign a job to a willing but not capable member.

Knowing each employee's maturity level allows the leader to determine the optimal leadership technique for assisting employees in achieving their objectives.

Read : 

Conflict resolution in educational leadership 
Crisis management and leadership styles 
Cultural diversity how it affects leadership organizational